5 thoughts on “#753 Substitution”

1. 

   RK

   02/04/2016, 4:05 am

   • Reply

   Sometimes, you’ve just gotta roll with what you’re given.

2. 

   DED

   02/04/2016, 8:14 am

   • Reply

   I can’t imagine what the original artwork was for.

   1. 

      DED

      02/04/2016, 8:16 am

      • Reply

      Upon further review, I believe that some “substitution” occurred with the artwork as well. 🙂

      1. 

         Nathan

         02/04/2016, 8:22 am

         • Reply

         Indeed. There was originally a boring ol’ puppy in the box.

         1. 

            DED

            02/04/2016, 12:38 pm

            The puppy must’ve been boring because the kid looks decidedly non-plussed by the contents of said box.